Europe is more civilized, but oh that cigarette smoke!

I was born in Eastern Europe, but grew up in Canada. Partially because of my background, and also for tourism/business, I’ve visited Europe a decent amount.

I’ve always though Europe was a bit more civilized (in the ways that matter to me) than North America. Take the transit situation; there are only a a half a dozen North American cities that have public transit infrastructures that equals that of the average western European city of even middlin’ (half a million people) size. I just spent a two week working vacation in the Munich area, and as in past visits to Germany, was impressed with how efficiently the U-Bahn (subway) and S-Bahn (suburban trains) cover the transit needs of the area, never mind the availability of high-speed trains to get to other cities.

But I must say, as always I’m completely appalled by the amount of smoking (and general acceptabnce of the practice) in public areas. I was killing an hour in a food court in the Munich airport yesterday, with the kids playing in a kids play area right there, and the air was full of cigarette smoke, to the point that my eyes stung by the time we left. The same story at the departure gate, where smoke from people sitting a ways over drifted onto everyone. When I got to Toronto about eight hours later and pulled down my jacket from the overhead bin, I could still smell cigarette smoke on it. All from hanging around the (necessary) public areas of a big airport. The same story when you go into a coffeeshop, where the air in any non-smoking area is quickly overwhelmed by smoke from a smoking area nearby.

Eastern Europe is of course even worst. After the fall of communism in most of the countries 15 years ago, better/cheaper cigarettes became easier to obtain, and smoking actually had an upswing.

North America was essentially the same about 20-30 years ago, so I guess there’s hope. It’s just hard to figure out how one geographical region progressed (I say that as a non-smoker :-) ), and the other didn’t…

 

18 responses


  1. Colin,

    most airports in Europe tend to be smoke free except for a small amount of areas so Munich most certainly be an exception. Being a heavy smoker myself I feel that things *are* in fact changing. Ireland for instance banned smoking in public areas (and bars) a couple of years ago and it’s about to happen in Holland as well (in about 5 to 10 years it’ll be the same here). Not that I care, I can certainly imagine the discomfort I’m causing ;-) .

    rgds,
    a

  2. André Bonkowski says:


    Here in Norway it has been banned to smoke in public areas offices and so on for years, unless for special designated areas. But last summer the non-smoking law was extended to:

    # Smoking isn’t allowed where food and/or drink are served.
    # Bars and restaurants won’t be allowed to create special rooms for smokers.
    # Smoking will be allowed in outdoor cafes, as long as the smoke doesn’t filter in to the cafe’s indoor area.
    # Owners of eating and drinking establishments must enforce the smoking ban.
    # Smoking rooms will be allowed for employees, as long as similar rest areas for non-smokers have at least as high a standard.

    I know Sweden also got a similar law this month.

    Welcome to a smoke free environment here in Norway, Colin :-)

    André

  3. Hmmm says:


    By “more civilized”, you mean ruder, more sullen and more inward looking than any other people on earth?

    I’ve travelled SE Asia, North America, South America, Australia and never met such generally dour, pessimistic, miserable and unfriendly people anywhere else. Sad but true.

    Not to mention the utterly pathological anti-americanism going around at the moment (I’m not even American, but oh-so-civilized Euros still find it necessary to subject me to their USA-related insecurities the minute they discover I’ve so much as been there to visit).

    Well, southern europe is much, much better (I certainly shouldn’t tar Italy, Spain and Portugal), and possibly also eastern europe, which I’ve never seen.

  4. Colin Sampaleanu (blog author) says:


    Hmmm indeed. You’re mixing a few different things here, only some of which fit under the banner of ‘civilized’:
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=civilized
    There’s no question to me that some of the peoples of Europe are more “inward looking, dour, pessimistic” than some of the peoples of other regions. But this generally has no bearing on whether the society would qualify as civilized or not.

    To me the definition of a civilized society is one in which a large group of people can live together in an efficient, low-crime, low-corruption, educated, and cultured fashion, and there is general buy-in by the people of the importance of these aspects. As to the rudeness aspect, that _is_ a mark of civility, but that’s a big mix all over the world, and you have to consider the man on the street vs. people you deal with in stores and institutions.

    As I mentioned, I was born in Romania, which is certainly the most ‘latin’ country in the old Eastern Bloc. I’ve certainly travelled a decent amount to Latin America and the poor countries of S-E Asia. I _love_ the atmosphere and generally more fiery or passionate temperament of the people in these places; to some extent it’s in my blood. At the same time, I’m not sure you can really call many of these countries civilized. Nice places to visit, or even live there if you have the money, but not great places (due to corruption, crime, pollution, education level, and many other reasons) to raise a family and grow a business.

    As for North America, Australia, and devleoped Asia, well, they certainly are civilized; here it’s more a matter of where the society places the emphasis, and how each individual sees that. There’s no question that western European states and the general population there place more emphasis on public transit, education, and culture, among other things, than we do in North America. In saying I always thought of Europe as being slightly more civilized, I was making a comment that reflected on what I think is important, and I’m sure others may not agree; this is a very subjective thing. And you’re not going to see me moving to Europe right now because of this either, :-) , there’re a number of other things to consider beside the fact that you consier one place ’slightly’ more civilized than another…

    Colin


  5. Hi Colin!

    As far as i’ve read some of the `addictions´ (like smoking, drinking, etc) when measured at a national level are a sign of the people wealth (the higher the rates the lower the wealth). And as you probably already know, even if the things are moving (in some fields in the right direction ;-) ), we have a lot to fight to get back.

    :alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|

  6. markstg says:


    I am also a Canadian (ex-smoker) (and Winnipeg, not T.O.), and things have definitely changed in Canada.
    I remember hearing stories from parents about going into the doctors office, late 60’s,
    70’s etc.. and the Doctor would be smoking in the doctors office!!!
    Its actually come to the point where it is seen as a form of abuse (i.e. child abuse)
    You see the commercials on T.V. about it here, etc..
    I do remember it as being very well acceptted in Europe (France, I especially remember)

    Anyway, its not good for you.. its not good for others…. (however I still miss it once in awhile)
    Basically, if it were as healthy as a glass of milk and it didnt hurt anyone.. I’d be going to
    the store for a pack of Marlboros right now.

    Cheers


  7. I’ll agree with Eastern Europe. I’m living in the Czech Republic and certain places are so smokey that 30 minutes can leave you feeling like you’ve lost a good deal of your lungs. It doesn’t seem so bad in restaurants, but any sort of music event and you’d better bring some breathing apparatus.

    There is one thing that is guaranteed to happen though. If a smoker sits/stands next to you the smoke will always, regardless of wind direction and laws of physics, float towards you.

  8. Paul says:


    I don’t agree with the non-smokeing laws and stuff.
    If you don’t like the smoke, then go somewhere else, but only because it isn’t healty you make us hide, and place us in “smoker areas”, we smokers have the same rights as you, what makes you more special to be able to stay in a coffe shop and i have to leave ?!?! if the coffe shop has a big sign posted with no smoking then i won’t go there, but DON’T try to impose those rules in each coffe show.

    I think we all know it isn’t healty… i know i might get cancer, and i know that my health is going downwards… but i like it so why do you make this discrimination ?!
    it is a discrimination no, smokers are now hunted down by “ackward” laws. Can i hunt people with a bad parfume, or a bad hygen… can i ask them to leave the room because they make me unconfortable


  9. I work in and live near Munich. Before that, I lived in Stuttgart which is about 150 miles away. In Stuttgart, smoking in public areas was an annoyance already, but Munich just outclasses Stuttgart by far. I hope German health insurance companies will charge smokers more and non-smokers less money sometime.

    Thanks for your good articles!

    Markus

  10. Patrick says:


    Paul,

    A bad parfume, or a bad hygen will hardly kill your neighbors but your bad cigarette smoke can !

  11. Paul says:


    The smoke can kill you, but not always… is your choice to “smoke” passively or not

    ps: should we put all the persons infected with AIDS on an island, or should they stay at home and never go out ?!

  12. John says:


    Actually, being a passive smoker means you have no choice - passive is the process of being subjected to something. If we had the choice then you would not hear any complaints.

    Smoking and AIDS are not equal comparisons. One is a choice that is continually made, the other is a disease which provides no choices. If a sufferer of AIDS walked around with a needle full of their blood, and started injecting people, then yes, they would (and should) be put on the equivalent of an ‘island’ (e.g segregated in a prison).

    At the end of the day, the choice of a smoker to smoke has a detrimental effect on everyone - it is killing both the smoker and the passive smoker. Non-smoking laws do not harm anyone, other than the indignation of the smoker. In my opinion it’s a no-brainer - the rights of people to lead their life without being subjected to a toxic substance far outweigh the freedom of the smoker to smoke anywhere.

  13. Paul says:


    about aids we know if we don’t do a few things we aren’t exposed… so you know about smooking those stuff, don’t do those ;)

    and please don’t speak about human rights, we have the same rights

    btw… isn’t weird that in US you can shoot a thief on your property and nobody will care, but if that thief falls down the stairs he can “sue” (dunno how to spell that :D )you and even win

  14. Marian says:


    hey, guys! And what about the smell, smoke etc. produced by any factory in it’s neighborhood you probably live? Do you have a choice? I don’t think so… IMHO it’s more bad for you than cigarette smoke can even be…

    Greetings from Czech Republic…

    (I am a smoker but I try my best to be considerate… :-)

  15. Mihai says:


    I live in toronto too, and I find it really hard to understand why smoking is hunted down with such zeal while no measures are taken to get rid of some of the pollution produced by the tons of SUV’s and other gas guzzlers that fill up its streets every day. I read somewhere that being behind one of these things at a traffic light for a minute is the equivalent of one cigarette. Paris has banned SUV’s from its streets. There’s something for you to think about when touching on the “civilization” issue.

  16. Paul says:


    Yesterday, or i think it was the day before yesterday some software development company (sounds so important if i say it this way, but what the heck…) introduced something called “smoking breaks”… that means you are allowed to have 3 such things / day. Quess what happened ? Three senior developers resigned, muhahaha take that you ignorant bastards (i’m talking to their bosses ;) )

  17. PALoukakos says:


    silly people…
    barbarians…
    rednecks and cowboys….
    they complain about other people smoking but they do own a car poluting the air that i breathe.

  18. Istvan says:


    sorry, but Romania is certainly not the most latin country from the old eastern block…
    but, you are right in the subject of smoking: it should be better to be more restricted in this area.
    greetings

Leave a Reply